Something like this.
Contemplating the weeds.
03-Jun-09A not-bad spiritual discussion between Andrew Sullivan and Bob Wright:
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/05/weeds-are-beautiful.html
Andrew Sullivan and abortion.
03-Jun-09The murder of Dr. Tiller has produced a fresh investigation of abortion. Andrew Sullivan has posted numerous personal stories about abortions. They are all worth reading and pondering.
It’s hard not to feel something like the Obama position: abortion is a moral issue, a deeply moral issue, like the way you use your body sexually, treat your friends, or spend your money. And as with all moral issues, it is possible to do things that are horribly wrong. But it does not always seem obvious that it is always and everywhere the worst possible moral option.
I have written three previous essays about abortion on this site, and the Obama position seems to grow in my estimation as time goes on.
Spike Lee’s When the Levees Broke.
03-Jun-09“Mean old Levee taught me to weep and moan.” – old Blues song.
If you want to get on the emotional inside of the experience of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans – and hence to feel the depth of America’s racial and economic segregation – then you would do well to watch Spike Lee’s documentary When the Levees Broke. The focus of the four-hour documentary is the personal experience of dozens of people from the Gulf Coast, mainly blacks in New Orleans. It is not factual or dispassionate, and you will not understand the technical problems, hydrology, meteorology, government, or culture of New Orleans better as a result of watching the movie. But you will understand the emotions of the city better. Hence you will hear blacks talking about how the levees were intentionally blown, and whites saying that the people in the Superdome were “not niggers but animals.” Countless times you have to watch people cry, or describe the deaths of people nearest them, or see with your own eyes the horrible, impersonal deaths that potentially await people in this country who, as a natural result of a corrupt “meritocracy”, no one cares about: bloated bodies floating for days in the muck, half-eaten by fish and dogs.
There are problems, as you might imagine with a Spike Lee film. It’s not clear why Al Sharpton and Harry Belafonte need to get so much time – Belafonte’s plug for Hugo Chavez and the footage of Chavez with Belafonte and Danny Glover seem especially irrelevant. Spike Lee’s treatment of Sean Penn, who gets a lot of interview time, is justifiable (celebrity is a part of American culture and New Orleans culture, and Penn used his to achieve things others could not) but unctuous. The documentary is four hours long and not organized at all – neither by chronology nor by themes – and the last two hours are extremely repetitive. (My recommendation is to watch the first two hours or “acts.”) Nor is there a real message to the movie, beyond the emotive outpouring of grief and anger. This is significant in itself, as the answer to the question “What then must we do?” concerning America’s problems continues to elude us.
And the Hurricane’s major value is that it exposed the preexistent problems and held up a mirror to American society. For so long everyone acknowledged that New Orleans was a strange and horrible city, but its magic and mystery served as ample justification for letting it continue as it was. But Katrina changed that. Situations which seemed acceptable no longer felt that way to people. Interestingly, whereas New Orleans had for years ranked as the happiest city in America – the largest percentage of people “very satisfied” with their lives – it now ranks among the very worst. There is an openness to change there, and Spike Lee has documented part of it.
The movie is also deepened by composer Terrence Blanchard’s excellent score, which now for me serves as a kind of soundtrack for the truly unfathomable mystery of suffering. The movie is worth watching just to hear Blanchard’s atmospheric and somber melodies.
Getting Around.
03-Jun-09A most unusual five days in New York City, spending time in all five boroughs as well as Nassau County and Jersey City.
On Tuesday I drove from Richmond Hill to Jersey City, leaving at 2:45 p.m. I arrived in Jersey City, which is certainly less than 15 miles away as the Crow Flies and perhaps closer to 10, at 5:45. I think my nerves still have not quite recovered either. Three hours of driving in traffic with a stick-shift car will do that to you (with no air conditioning, I will add).
But the City looked amazing, and to see it from Brooklyn Heights, the Battery, Staten Island (including the ferry), and Exchange Place reminded me just how watery and unusual it is among the great cities of the world.
Suzanne Vega Live.
27-May-09I went with a friend to see Suzanne Vega play an acoustic show at the Sanctuary Concerts in Chatham, New Jersey. If you rely on the radio to give you a sense of what’s happening in the pop music world, you haven’t heard much from Ms. Vega recently. In corporate radio terms she remains a “two-hit wonder,” known for her 80s hit “Luka” and “Tom’s Diner.” A few songs from a following album – “In Liverpool,” “Blood Makes Noise” – got Indie radio play. Three subsequent albums produced no hits.
Instead, what you find is a career that intelligent artists dream of: early success and popularity which is then used to pursue increasing skill, artistry, beauty, and craftsmanship, all building a bridge between her internal experience and the external world. This bridge between inner and outer is now so firm and sure that she is returning fruitfully to her earlier work, cleaning up the earlier awkwardnesses and refreshing their message.
Sibelius said that too many musicians start with a perceived need, and then write to try to fulfill it – “I need a big melody to carry a symphonic movement,” “I need a hit single.” The proper method, he said, is to generate the melodies, and then let their own inner logic dictate the form they must take. Suzanne Vega’s music shows precisely this organic growth.
It operates on two levels, the first being melodic: she writes interesting melodies which are a pleasure to listen to and sing. The second, however, is just as important: she begins from the fact of her voice, and writes music to suit it.
Her voice is a gift of nature. It has of course been improved by training, but very few people could sing as she does and give so much pleasure. She uses no vibrato, stays within a very narrow tonal range, and hardly varies her volume. She cannot “belt out” songs, and she never overwhelms her listeners. But her voice is a thing of beauty in itself, and she has nearly complete control over it, using the most delicate phrasing and vocal lines. She is also never out of key. She is one of those few pop artists whose voice does not need to be fixed or amplified in the studio. She sounds as good, if not better, live.
One of the reasons for this is that she is now aware of the unique enchantment of her voice, and she has striven in recent years to strip her music down to uncover this essential beauty. She brought only one bandmember, a guitarist, who used the guitar’s electric range to serve in place of any number of instruments, while she played acoustic guitar herself. She publicized at the concert her intention of re-releasing all her earlier work in acoustic versions, which seemed to me and my companion a fantastic idea.
In keeping with this general direction, she played songs from all her albums, including stripped-down versions of some of her best 80s material: “Left of Center” – which sounded superb, its pop melody laid bare; “Marlene on the Wall,” which served as the opener; and “Luka,” which she sang with real passion and made it sound like a standout song. “Tom’s Diner” she has turned into an audience-participation crowdpleaser, which works well. It brought a huge smile to her face to see the crowd enjoy it so much – an interesting peek into her artist’s psyche, which despite its sense of superiority always ultimately loves to please. She closed with “Calypso,” an early song about the goddess who loved Odysseus but let him leave, and she sang it with the depth of feeling that comes with maturity and hard experience in the noble sorrow of letting go. Closing with this song was by no means obvious, and it quieted the crowd, but she sang it superlatively. She sings it an octave above her normal range, but still wonderfully.
Every song she performed was excellent. “When Heroes Go Down” allowed her to push the tempo and show some force; “In Liverpool” was pure melancholy and longing; “Frank and Ava” was simultaneously poppy and serious (it opens with a reference to Ava Gardner’s summation of her troubles with Frank Sinatra: “We didn’t have any problems in bed. The troubles would start on the way to the bidet.”). “New York is a Woman” is one of the best songs ever written about modern New York, especially about Nine-eleven (it was also disfigured on the album Beauty and Crime by a non-acoustic recording, but restored to its full beauty in concert).
Two songs worked less well in this acoustic format, “Pornographer’s Dream” and “Caramel,” beautifully sensuous songs which are suited by rich backing texture. Her guitarist attempted to mimic these textures with his guitar, but in the end an orchestra is an orchestra, and a guitar is only a guitar.
The Sanctuary Concerts, while not a widely known venue, offered her a perfect stage: the concerts are in a Presbyterian Church with superior acoustics, and though my friend and I sat in the last row everything sounded as though it were not electronically filtered but merely the natural sound of voice and guitar. After the first song someone in the crowd cried out “More guitar!” I found her reaction very interesting. She immediately called the comment to the attention of her sound-man. He said (rightly) “Yes, I heard him. He’s wrong.” She was intent on pleasing, and intent on getting it right. Yet all was done with confidence and without any trace of self-doubt.
All in all, I found Ms. Vega an artistic inspiration. She has produced material of continually escalating intelligence and poise, revealing more and more of her life, reflecting wisely on the experience of others, rendering to others the experience of living in New York, and has stayed resolutely on her own path. She has found what she does best, and continues to do it better year by year. She’s one of the treasures of our city, a New Yorker who gets it and passes it on.
David Foster Wallace and Attention.
25-May-09A fine speech by David Foster Wallace, a writer who committed suicide last fall. His style does not appeal all that much, and the first half of this speech wanders a bit without saying much, but it has a real truth which is worth pondering.
http://www.moreintelligentlife.com/story/david-foster-wallace-in-his-own-words
Table Mountain, from Wildcat Mountain.
14-May-09Stage Five: Washington to New York.
14-May-09I arrived in Washington in the afternoon. I stayed with a friend from junior high school, whom I had last seen while in college. She lived just off Pennsylvania Avenue, in a nice neighborhood where Foggy Bottom meets Georgetown meets Dupont Circle. We parked the truck and went for an afternoon walk, first to Rock Creek Park and then to the Mall, where we sat on a park bench in the rain. There was a lot to talk about.
We enjoyed Washington the next day, spinning through a museum of American design – part of the Smithsonian – and the Botanical Garden, which was lovely. As we walked along the mall, talking about the show Friday Night Lights, who came down from the Capitol towards us but David Brooks, the New York Times commentator and cultural observer. It was an unusual moment, because I had long felt that one thing that Brooks had left out of his (excellent and insightful) book Bobos in Paradise is sports, and we had just been talking sports and I had just been about to mention that David Brooks needed to turn his powers of cultural observation to this topic. So I introduced myself to him, and told him that I thought he should think about this as a topic, looking at all its strangeness: $2500 seats at Yankees games, the link between athletics and income (and hence college education), the bizarrerie of the Super Bowl, the soccer vs. baseball vs. lacrosse self-definitions, all of that stuff. In about forty seconds I had said my say and we parted ways. He may have been thinking about how to solve the healthcare problem or Obama’s place in history or something far more weighty, but I balanced my brief seizure of his mind by being quick. And who knows, maybe he will write a book about it someday.
Encounters with famous people are very strange, because oddly enough it’s the unfamous person who has all the power in the encounter. I knew a fair amount about David Brooks, while he knew nothing whatsoever about me. Consequently I had all the power and could direct the conversation as I pleased – symbolized by the mere fact that I could turn his head by saying “David Brooks!” while he could do no such thing to me.
New Orleans had been a general topic of conversation, and later that evening we watched the first two acts of Spike Lee’s documentary When the Levees Broke. It is a very interesting and very worthwhile film – at least the first two acts of it (of four; it is very long; I will finish it while in the Catskills). It is not much about facts, but rather about the experiences of the people who suffered most from hurricane Katrina and its aftermath. As a result, it distances you from any possible reactions but sympathy. I found myself on the verge of tears most of the time I was watching it. Human experience is overwhelming when you let it in. The personal link I felt with New Orleans also made it all the more moving, but I couldn’t help but think of how I would react if such a thing happened to New York. (I did react very personally with the attack on the World Trade Center). And really, I don’t believe anything has improved in terms of our government. If New York City had to be evacuated – 8 million people, 6 million without automobiles, trying to carry with them their most cherished belongings as well as pets – would our government be capable of pulling off anything but a complete logistical disaster? Almost certainly not. And yet such an evacuation is a possibility.
On Saturday morning we headed up to New York. It was almost unbearably exciting to see its towers in the distance – how beautiful and grand it seemed. I was back home. I felt like a new creation, and that a new chapter had begun.

Obama’s Cairo Speech.
05-Jun-09I thought about this a lot as I heard older folk talk about the presidential campaign: what a gift the internet is, to deliver us from what used to be called journalism. Here’s the full video and transcript of the Obama speech in Cairo. It’s quite extraordinary if looked at in full.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/06/02/us/politics/200900604_OBAMA_CAIRO.html